Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 8:42:33 GMT
The future of Ukraine as a state is hanging in the balance. The Russian invasion should never have happened. Ukraine has become a victim of a resumption of Cold War politics, due to incompetent leadership and bad decision-making. By holding NATO and Russia responsible for the current conflict, we must take a step back and ask whether we could have prevented this terrible humanitarian catastrophe. Ukraine has become a battleground of superpower politics. Since it declared independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, it is the great world powers that have decided on the fate of this country.
Could we have avoided Brazil Telegram Number Data today's war? We will never know for sure. But based on the history of nuclear powers not engaging in full-scale war, we can assume that things would have been different today if Ukraine had not given up its nuclear weapons. Ukraine had the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world. But it surrendered all its nuclear weapons, as part of the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. But why did Ukraine surrender its nuclear weapons? Short-sighted political decision-making and willingness to trust superpowers played a role here. Read also: Caught with a rifle and cartridges in the car, the 18-year-old is arrested in Saranda Zelensky begs the West for weapons from the front line Ukraine, the second largest country of the Soviet Union, voted in a referendum on independence on December 1, 1991. 90 percent of Ukrainians voted in favor of total independence.
The Soviet Union was a nuclear power. One third of the Soviet Union's nuclear weapons were produced and stored in Ukraine, or 1,700 atomic bombs. In addition to Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan also inherited nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union. These weapons serve as a deterrent to future invasions and full-scale conflicts. However, their maintenance is very expensive. In the early 1990s, poverty plagued Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus, and millions of people were on the brink of starvation. The money was missing. And as the cost of maintaining nuclear weapons rose, Kazakhstan and Belarus were ready to hand over their nuclear technology to Russia.
Could we have avoided Brazil Telegram Number Data today's war? We will never know for sure. But based on the history of nuclear powers not engaging in full-scale war, we can assume that things would have been different today if Ukraine had not given up its nuclear weapons. Ukraine had the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world. But it surrendered all its nuclear weapons, as part of the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. But why did Ukraine surrender its nuclear weapons? Short-sighted political decision-making and willingness to trust superpowers played a role here. Read also: Caught with a rifle and cartridges in the car, the 18-year-old is arrested in Saranda Zelensky begs the West for weapons from the front line Ukraine, the second largest country of the Soviet Union, voted in a referendum on independence on December 1, 1991. 90 percent of Ukrainians voted in favor of total independence.
The Soviet Union was a nuclear power. One third of the Soviet Union's nuclear weapons were produced and stored in Ukraine, or 1,700 atomic bombs. In addition to Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan also inherited nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union. These weapons serve as a deterrent to future invasions and full-scale conflicts. However, their maintenance is very expensive. In the early 1990s, poverty plagued Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus, and millions of people were on the brink of starvation. The money was missing. And as the cost of maintaining nuclear weapons rose, Kazakhstan and Belarus were ready to hand over their nuclear technology to Russia.